by Diane Weber Bederman
I've been reading about the war in Burma/Myanmar. It's a conflict between the Buddhist Burmese majority and approximately 800,000 Rohingya Muslims in the Arakan (Rakhine) State. They are among the world's least wanted and most persecuted people.
I've been reading about the war in Burma/Myanmar. It's a conflict between the Buddhist Burmese majority and approximately 800,000 Rohingya Muslims in the Arakan (Rakhine) State. They are among the world's least wanted and most persecuted people.
I'll
try to explain what's happening. The Media have been remiss in
reporting the story.
"Human
Rights Watch accused authorities in Burma, including Buddhist monks, of
fomenting an organized campaign of ethnic cleansing against the country's
Rohingya Muslim minority that killed hundreds of people and forced 125,000 from
their homes," This campaign of ethnic cleansing against Rohingya Muslims in Arakan
State has been going on since June 2012. October 2012, tens of thousands of
Muslims were terrorized and forcibly relocated, denied access to humanitarian
aid and have been unable to return home. It's a humanitarian crisis.
Most
of us are familiar with Buddhist monks self-immolating in the name of freedom
but I don't see any of that going on in Burma in the name of freedom for the
Muslims.
I've
often been chastised for my belief in the Judeo-Christian God of the Hebrew and
Greek Bibles. "He's barbaric; the teachings are the cause of all
wars." I'm told more people have been killed in the name of religion than
any other reason. Not true, but believed anyway.
I'm
told Buddhism is the better way. It's not a religion
with a God; it's a philosophy. Real Buddhism is very tolerant and not concerned
with labels like "Christian," "Muslim," "Hindu"
or "Buddhist"; that's why there have never been any wars fought in
the name of Buddhism.
Buddhists
go out of their way to protect life -- even bending down to remove a creature
form a path for fear of killing it. Wouldn't hurt a fly. Maybe, but killing
others doesn't seem to be a problem for the Buddhists in Burma/Myanmar.
Buddhists are human. Underneath that thin layer of civility lies the barbarian
within.
"Buddhists
are supposed to be peace-loving people, so why are they attacking the
Rohingya?" In Rakhine State up to 1000 Muslims have been killed, 8000
homes razed, 140,000 people displaced 94 per cent of whom are Muslim. Tens of
thousands of Rohingya refugees fleeing from Buddhist mobs are living in
primitive camps described as "open air prisons," that are off limits
to foreigners.
Rohingya
villages not evacuated or destroyed are under guard: "essentially creating
ethnic ghettos that lack access to food, water and medical supplies."
There are checkpoints and barricaded crossroads. This forced segregation is
particularly pronounced in the state capital Sittwe where Muslims once made up
nearly half of the city's population of 180,000. Its once-bustling streets are
now entirely Muslim-free.
U
Kyaw Hla Aung, 73, an activist lawyer living within one of the camps (described
as a guarded prison) for displaced Muslims, reported the Buddhists (Arakanese)
are destroying mosques and Muslim houses. There's extortion, torture, rape,
killings and mass graves. He described it as a "hidden genocide." He
has video of people being marched out of Sittwe at gunpoint, carrying their few
possessions on their heads.
These
people suffer from tuberculosis, diarrhea and malaria. Yet, U Sa King Da, the
38-year-old leader of Sittwe's 200-strong Young Monks' Association, who
describes the Rohingya as "polygamous . . . and incestuous," accused
the Muslims of setting fire to their own houses, deliberately contracting
tuberculosis, and starving their children to garner international aid and
sympathy.
The
UN and Doctors Without Borders are afraid to work here because their workers
have been targeted by Arakanese activists. It's next to impossible to report on
atrocities in the ghettos and IDP (internally
displaced peoples) camps when the host country prevents access. Perhaps that's
the reason the "media" has been remiss in reporting from this area.
July
2013, Ban Ki-Moon ,
Secretary general of the UN urged the Myanmar government to resolve the problem
of nearly 1 million stateless Rohingya Muslims, living on the border with
Bangladesh, who since 1982 have been denied official ethnic status and rights
of citizenship. President Thein Sein of Burma had tried to convince the UN to
help "resettle" them.
Elaine Pearson, deputy
Asia director at Human Rights Watch (HRW), said the group "would expect a
strong international response" to any attempt to deport the Rohingya. HRW
staff who recently returned from Arakan reported torture against the
Royhingyas. "I saw these youths burning the testicles and penis of old men
with a cheroot [Burmese cigar] and also hitting young Muslim detainees with an
iron rod and pushing a wooden stick in their anus."
Meanwhile,
there's growing support from a radical Buddhist organization 969 who are
campaigning for a boycott of Muslim products and businesses and a ban on
interfaith marriage. The Rohingya can't marry without obtaining permission.
They can't own land. They're denied citizenship and are restricted from leaving
the area. There's also in place a decade old law restricting these Muslims to
only two children per family. Some of these laws are straight from Nuremberg.
Where
is this "strong international response promised by Human Rights Watch?
At
the very same time in July, Islamic nations called
in the United Nations to halt the "tyranny" the Muslims are enduring.
"The most basic human rights and human values are being stepped upon by
the current government and by the radical elements within Myanmar."
Djibouti's U.N. ambassador and head of the OIC (Organization of Islamic
Cooperation) group at the U.N., called the action against Rohingyas
"ethnic cleansing" and "there has to be an end to the
persecution."
When
Arab states demand action against Israel and approve resolutions, the United
Nations responds immediately. Why is there silence, now? Why is this
organization not following the request of the Muslim Arab states to protect the
Rohingya?
After
all the violence against the Rohingya, the reports from Human Rights watch,
UNHCR, Doctors Without Borders, eye witness accounts, Nobel Peace Prize winner,
Aung San Suu Kyi called it a "huge international tragedy," in late
2012. Then added: "Don't forget that violence has been committed by both
sides. This is why I prefer not to take sides."
Held
under house arrest, finally allowed freedom to speak, when she's most needed,
she failed to live up to the courage of her convictions. She's another false
idol who has migrated into people's minds.
Her spokesman made matters worse by questioning
whether the Rohingya ethnic group even exists.
"Apartheid-like policies have
segregated Buddhists from Muslims, many of whom fester in primitive camps for
internally displaced people (IDPs) with little hope of resettlement." What
are these policies? Separate living areas for one group based on religion and
according to human rights groups, racism. Many Rohingya face discrimination
because they resemble darker-skinned Muslim Bangladeshis and
speak a distinct Bengali dialect.
When
Rohingya Muslims were forced into refugee camps, Buddhist families from
Bangladesh were resettled in their abandoned neighbourhoods. Essential services in
these refugee camps such as health care, water, sanitation and education are
woefully inadequate and in most cases non-existent. They have a much poorer
living standard: open-air prisons, checkpoints, barricades and face ethnic
cleansing: a hidden genocide.
This
is taking place in a country in the process of exploiting its natural resources. "Rumors of
extensive mineral wealth in Rakhine [Arakan] State would add or perhaps are now
adding fuel to the existing ethnic tensions," said the Harvard Ash Center
in a July 2013 report. That might explain the response from The Europe Union, a
stickler for human rights. It has lifted trade and investment sanctions.
I've
heard not a word from the United Church of Canada or CUPE, Canada's largest
public union or recall cries from Naomi Klein or Noam Chomsky against this
apartheid state or the potential environmental damage from proposed pipelines.
So
dear readers, why do you think the media isn't reporting on this atrocity in
the making? Is it that Buddhists are the oppressors? Is it that it's too
difficult to report from this part of the world? Or is it that these people
just don't count?
Source: Huffington Post